FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • On the Wii you version of Disney infinity 2.0 If you were used if you were to place down omanidadorids and use the stopwatch Some of them will start T posing I just noticed this is pretty hilarious

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello!

    Sorry for disturbing you...

    help me , please. I bought a set 4 figures, a portal and a 3.0 game disc. I started playing in the Toy Box mode. It's OK. But when I put the crystal to the portal, something weird happening. The Enter to the Twilight of the Republic title appears and the console starts to load the level (I think). But after loading, when the game starts, I see just a dark backround (green and blue lights are at the top of the tv) and it seems to be like my character falling down. After 4-5 secs, restarts the level and a lose one life from my figure. I tried another figure, the same. I can not starts to play. What is wrong ? What can I do ? Please help me, 2 children is waiting for your answers. THX.  bokor76@gmail.com

      Loading editor
    • Perhaps your copy of Twilight of the Republic is faulty? You may need to look for another one on eBay or Amazon.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Please get back to me as soon as possible! It turns out the hacker has multiple accounts and it's getting out of hand!! I'm on the verge of tears right now and it's an absolute nightmare! He has total control of my editing rights! He edited my page again and he won't stop! What's worse? He's also watching my page too, so he can do it again and again!

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • On Wikia, any user can edit any userpage, unless it's protected as RRabbit42 said. You haven't been hacked, don't worry.

        Loading editor
    • Dragonian King wrote: On Wikia, any user can edit any userpage, unless it's protected as RRabbit42 said. You haven't been hacked, don't worry.

      Thank you. I was more worried about my identity being stolen. As long as other users know that the edit may not accurately represent me I'm fine with it. I won't be surprised if it happens again for a third time and beyond.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • A user called RVW443 hacked and edited my profile. I had to undo the garbage he put on my profile tab. Please either give him a warning or ban him completely! I don't want anyone else to be a potential victim to this!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • There's a new user called User:BabyGeniusFan666 and they're making lots of bad edits that I keep having to revert. The trouble is, they're not really breaking any rules and I'm not sure what to say to them. If you could help out that would be great, thanks!

      Loading editor
    • Dragonian King wrote:
      There's a new user called User:BabyGeniusFan666 and they're making lots of bad edits that I keep having to revert. The trouble is, they're not really breaking any rules and I'm not sure what to say to them. If you could help out that would be great, thanks!

      Wasn't really sure either, I'm out of practice. "Our wiki is mostly dead, so at this point we'll basically have to assume misinformation is purposeful vandalism since our wiki isn't under careful watch anymore, so we don't want you getting unfairly banned." I think it might have to come to this, not really sure though as that's far more extreme than I want it to be but also like our wiki is a rotting corpse for vulture vandals/trolls. Although we can give like short bans to discourage it. I'm not sure, what do you think? Wouldn't be like like a zero tolerance thing, it would be more like they get a warning or two then they get a ban.

        Loading editor
    • Zinkr7 wrote:

      Dragonian King wrote:
      There's a new user called User:BabyGeniusFan666 and they're making lots of bad edits that I keep having to revert. The trouble is, they're not really breaking any rules and I'm not sure what to say to them. If you could help out that would be great, thanks!

      Wasn't really sure either, I'm out of practice. "Our wiki is mostly dead, so at this point we'll basically have to assume misinformation is purposeful vandalism since our wiki isn't under careful watch anymore, so we don't want you getting unfairly banned." I think it might have to come to this, not really sure though as that's far more extreme than I want it to be but also like our wiki is a rotting corpse for vulture vandals/trolls. Although we can give like short bans to discourage it. I'm not sure, what do you think? Wouldn't be like like a zero tolerance thing, it would be more like they get a warning or two then they get a ban.

      Yeah, kind of a tough situation here. On one hand, most of their edits aren't constructive, but they're also not breaking policy in any way (it doesn't seem to be purposeful vandalism) and I don't really like the idea of banning someone just for making low quality edits.

        Loading editor
    • Well nevermind that, it seems to have gone into purposeful vandalism now. There was also some inappropriate language on an edit to Venom, so I'll give them a 1 month block.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Just a heads up, I blocked User:Grace Ong Chu Wen for 3 months for making some very not nice spam.

      Loading editor
    • Oh thanks for letting me know. I trust your judgement there. It has been a while.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, this is Andre132.

    I know you're going to block me for being a sockpuppet, but I just felt like I needed to write a message to you.

    What I did in the past was unacceptable. I'm not going to try to convince you that I did nothing wrong, because I certainly did and I certainly was a horrible person back then. However, I couldn't live with myself if I did all of that and never even apologised for it.

    This is my apology. Whether you believe it or not, I am truly sorry for what happened in the past. It was unacceptable what I did and I really feel bad for everyone on this wiki who had to suffer those times because of me.

    I don't blame you if you don't forgive me. I don't blame you if you or anyone else on this wiki hates me, since I do deserve it. But like I said, I needed to get it off my chest or else I'd feel bad for the rest of my life for being a bratty kid who insulted people and swore.

    This was my apology, and I understand if you don't forgive me,

    - Andre132.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I blocked User:Ballkayle indefinitely for making a spam post on the forums. It appears the only other wiki they've been on was the Lego Dimensions Wiki, where they also made the same spam post yesterday, so I'm assuming it's just a spam account.

      Loading editor
  • Hi, Zinky. :)

    Just a quick question about the Playable Characters category: should we be putting it onto planned playable characters that were scrapped? (Not Zurg, but other characters like Moana and Maui; characters that never made it, but would have been playable had they made it.) I've used it that way a few times, but I'm still not sure about it and wanted to hear your opinion.

    Thank you,

    Awesome sig

    MeTalkEditsDerpDisney Infinity19:16,12/24/2016

      Loading editor
    • Sorry for the late response.

      Ultimately, they're not really playable in the game, thus it would be misleading.

      Feel free to make a category for characters that were gunna be playable but were scrapped due to DI ending though, if you want.

        Loading editor
    • Zinkr7 wrote:
      Sorry for the late response.

      T'sall good. :) You still replied earlier than the non-Wikia people I've been dealing with lately.

      Zinkr7 wrote:
      Ultimately, they're not really playable in the game, thus it would be misleading.

      Feel free to make a category for characters that were gunna be playable but were scrapped due to DI ending though, if you want.


      I've actually been thinking about how we would do that. I guess we would call it Scrapped Playable Characters, then?

      And also, would we also use it for characters that were almost playable but still showed up in the games, like Zurg or Arlo?

        Loading editor
    • CerealBoxHead46 wrote:
      Zinkr7 wrote:
      Sorry for the late response.

      T'sall good. :) You still replied earlier than the non-Wikia people I've been dealing with lately.


      Zinkr7 wrote:
      Ultimately, they're not really playable in the game, thus it would be misleading.

      Feel free to make a category for characters that were gunna be playable but were scrapped due to DI ending though, if you want.


      I've actually been thinking about how we would do that. I guess we would call it Scrapped Playable Characters, then?

      And also, would we also use it for characters that were almost playable but still showed up in the games, like Zurg or Arlo?

      I would say it's best used just for content that was scrapped due to DI's termination.

        Loading editor
    • Zinkr7 wrote:
      CerealBoxHead46 wrote:
      Zinkr7 wrote:
      Sorry for the late response.
      T'sall good. :) You still replied earlier than the non-Wikia people I've been dealing with lately.


      Zinkr7 wrote:
      Ultimately, they're not really playable in the game, thus it would be misleading.

      Feel free to make a category for characters that were gunna be playable but were scrapped due to DI ending though, if you want.


      I've actually been thinking about how we would do that. I guess we would call it Scrapped Playable Characters, then?

      And also, would we also use it for characters that were almost playable but still showed up in the games, like Zurg or Arlo?

      I would say it's best used just for content that was scrapped due to DI's termination.

      Alright, sounds good. Thanks, Zink! :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, Zinkr. I'm LunchTime123, and I'm back after a couple of years.

    I just wanted to know...am I still allowed on this wiki?

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.